Sadik Kadir vs Adam Feeney Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L W L L L
Form
W W W W L W L W L LHead To Head: Kadir 4 - 2 Feeney
They have played 15 sets in total, with Kadir winning 10 and Feeney winning 5. The last match between Kadir and Feeney was at the Australia F12, 01-12-2008, Quarterfinals, Hard with Adam Feeney getting the victory w/o.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sadik Kadir | 4 |
| Adam Feeney | 2 |
Australia F12(01-12-2008)
| Kadir | Stats | Feeney |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 4 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 352 | Highest Rank | 248 |
| 43 | Age | 40 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 6 |
| 51% (201-194) | Career Total W/L | 56% (292-233) |
| $2,120 | Career Prize Money | $15,265 |
| 3 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
| 7-5 4-6 4-0 ret. | |||||
| 7-6(3) 2-6 7-5 | |||||
| 7-5 6-0 | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-7(10) 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 10 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 78 | Games Won | 70 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sadik Kadir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Frederico Gil
Player
Sadik Kadir
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sadik Kadir
Player
George Bastl
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
43 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Arnaud Clement
Player
Sadik Kadir
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Adam Feeney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bumpei Sato
Player
Adam Feeney
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Whittington
Player
Adam Feeney
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
13
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (201/194) | Win/Loss | 56% (292/233) |
| 51% (454/436) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (670/536) |
| 51% (4185/4065) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6008/5391) |
| 57% (142/109) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (229/167) |
| 39% (33/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (25/29) |
| 48% (13/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (12/17) |
| 39% (13/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (26/20) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 40 | Aces Total | 161 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 27 | Total Double Faults | 256 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 462.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.44 |
| 58% (509/872) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2097/3279) |
| 69% (349/509) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1413/2097) |
| 44% (160/361) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (510/1182) |
| 48% (22/46) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (111/262) |
| 34% (268/790) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1140/3043) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 20% (2/8) |
| 38% (8/13) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 46% (64/75) | Challenger W/L | 47% (72/82) |
| 55% (129/105) | Futures W/L | 62% (210/131) |
| 51% (200/389) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (284/512) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 55% (52/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (79/164) |
| 50% (52/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (70/159) |
| 88% (192/169) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (309/259) |
| 11% (192/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (309/49) |
| 16% (202/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (216/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
